Russian
(pdf)
World Economic
Outlook Update
An Uneven
Global Recovery Continues
July
2014
www.imf.org/weo
|
 |
Download
full text (PDF)

• The global growth projection for 2014 has been marked down by 0.3
percent to 3.4 percent, reflecting both the legacy of the weak first
quarter, particularly in the United States, and a less optimistic outlook
for several emerging markets. With somewhat stronger growth expected in some
advanced economies next year, the global growth projection for 2015 remains
at 4 percent.1/
• Global growth is expected to rebound from the second quarter of
2014, as some of the drivers underlying first quarter weakness, such as the
inventory correction in the United States, should have only temporary
effects, and others should be offset by policies, including in China. But
the first-quarter setback will only be partially offset.
• Downside risks remain a concern. Increased geopolitical risks could
lead to sharply higher oil prices. Financial market risks include
higher-than-expected U.S. long-term rates and a reversal of recent risk
spread and volatility compression. Global growth could be weaker for longer,
given the lack of robust momentum in advanced economies despite very low
interest rates and the easing of other brakes to the recovery. In some major
emerging market economies, the negative growth effects of supply-side
constraints and the tightening of financial conditions over the past year
could be more protracted.
• In many advanced and emerging market economies, structural reforms
are urgently needed to close infrastructure gaps, strengthen productivity,
and lift potential growth.
Global growth moderated more than expected in the first quarter of 2014,
from an annual rate of 3¾ percent in the second half of 2013 to 2¾
percent—some ½ percentage point lower than the forecast in the April 2014
World Economic Outlook (WEO). Although there were upside surprises
to activity—in Japan, and also in Germany, Spain, and the United
Kingdom—four negative surprises dominated.
In the United States, the inventory overhang at the end of 2013 turned
out to be larger than expected, leading to a stronger correction. A harsh
winter further dampened demand, exports declined sharply after a strong
fourth quarter, and output contracted in the first quarter of 2014. In
China, domestic demand moderated more than expected, reflecting the
authorities’ effort to rein in credit growth and a correction to real estate
activity. Activity in Russia decelerated sharply as geopolitical tensions
further weakened demand. In other emerging market economies,
weaker-than-projected growth resulted both from weaker external demand,
notably from the United States and China, and, in a number of cases, softer
domestic demand with weaker investment growth.
Financial conditions have eased since the April 2014 WEO was released.
Long-term interest rates in advanced economies have declined further, in
part reflecting expectations of a lower neutral policy rate over the medium
term; indicators of expected price volatility have declined as well, and
equity prices have strengthened. With euro area inflation in April below
expectations, the European Central Bank cut its policy rate and deployed
other easing measures at its June meeting. In this environment, capital
flows to emerging market economies have recovered despite generally weaker
activity, bond spreads for emerging market sovereigns have declined, and
exchange rates and equity prices have stabilized or even strengthened in
some of these economies.
Leading indicators point to the global recovery regaining strength in the
second quarter of 2014. This is consistent with the view that the unexpected
weakness in the first quarter was in large part temporary, because the
impact of factors such as harsh winter weather and inventory correction will
disappear and policies have already responded to weaker growth, including in
China. Moreover, key drivers supporting the recovery identified in the April
2014 WEO remain in place, including moderating fiscal consolidation and
highly accommodative monetary policy in most advanced economies.
Nevertheless, some of the demand weakness in the first quarter appears to be
more persistent, especially in investment globally, and is expected to
result in lower global growth in 2014 compared with that predicted in the
April 2014 WEO. Overall, global growth, which is now computed using the new
2011 purchasing power parities of the International Comparison Program (see
box), is projected to rise to 3.4 percent in 2014 and 4 percent in 2015
(Table 1).
Turning to the major advanced economies, a growth rebound is underway in
the United States as temporary factors wane. But with a more muted
recovery in investment, the rebound is expected to provide only a partial
offset to the weak first-quarter outcome in terms of annual growth. Growth
is now projected at 1.7 percent for 2014, rising to 3 percent in 2015.
Growth in the euro area is expected to strengthen to 1.1 percent in
2014 and 1½ percent in 2015 but to remain uneven across the region,
reflecting continued financial fragmentation, impaired private and public
sector balance sheets, and high unemployment in some economies. In Japan,
with a stronger than expected performance in the first quarter, growth in
2014 is now projected to be higher at 1.6 percent, decelerating to 1.1
percent in 2015, mostly due to the planned unwinding of fiscal stimulus.
|
|
Table 1. Overview of the World Economic Outlook
Projections
1/
(Percent change unless noted otherwise) |
|
|
Year over Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference
from April 2014 WEO Projections
2/ |
|
Q4 over Q4 |
|
|
|
Projections |
|
|
Estimates |
Projections |
|
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
|
2014 |
2015 |
|
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
World Output |
3.5 |
3.2 |
3.4 |
4.0 |
|
-0.3 |
0.0 |
|
3.6 |
3.3 |
3.8 |
Advanced Economies |
1.4 |
1.3 |
1.8 |
2.4 |
|
-0.4 |
0.1 |
|
2.0 |
1.8 |
2.4 |
United States |
2.8 |
1.9 |
1.7 |
3.0 |
|
-1.1 |
0.1 |
|
2.6 |
1.7 |
3.0 |
Euro Area |
-0.7 |
-0.4 |
1.1 |
1.5 |
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
|
0.5 |
1.4 |
1.6 |
Germany |
0.9 |
0.5 |
1.9 |
1.7 |
|
0.2 |
0.1 |
|
1.4 |
1.8 |
1.8 |
France |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.7 |
1.4 |
|
-0.3 |
-0.1 |
|
0.8 |
1.0 |
1.6 |
Italy |
-2.4 |
-1.9 |
0.3 |
1.1 |
|
-0.3 |
0.0 |
|
-0.9 |
0.8 |
1.2 |
Spain |
-1.6 |
-1.2 |
1.2 |
1.6 |
|
0.3 |
0.6 |
|
-0.2 |
1.7 |
1.5 |
Japan |
1.4 |
1.5 |
1.6 |
1.1 |
|
0.3 |
0.1 |
|
2.4 |
1.4 |
0.6 |
United Kingdom |
0.3 |
1.7 |
3.2 |
2.7 |
|
0.4 |
0.2 |
|
2.7 |
3.4 |
2.2 |
Canada |
1.7 |
2.0 |
2.2 |
2.4 |
|
-0.1 |
0.0 |
|
2.7 |
2.0 |
2.4 |
Other Advanced Economies |
2.0 |
2.3 |
3.0 |
3.2 |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
2.8 |
2.7 |
3.7 |
Emerging Market and Developing Economies |
5.1 |
4.7 |
4.6 |
5.2 |
|
-0.2 |
-0.1 |
|
5.1 |
4.8 |
5.0 |
Commonwealth of Independent States |
3.4 |
2.2 |
0.9 |
2.1 |
|
-1.0 |
-1.1 |
|
2.1 |
-0.4 |
0.9 |
Russia |
3.4 |
1.3 |
0.2 |
1.0 |
|
-1.1 |
-1.3 |
|
2.0 |
-0.1 |
0.4 |
Excluding Russia |
3.6 |
4.2 |
2.4 |
4.4 |
|
-0.6 |
-0.6 |
|
. . . |
. . . |
. . . |
Emerging and Developing Asia |
6.7 |
6.6 |
6.4 |
6.7 |
|
-0.2 |
-0.1 |
|
6.7 |
6.6 |
6.4 |
China |
7.7 |
7.7 |
7.4 |
7.1 |
|
-0.2 |
-0.2 |
|
7.7 |
7.7 |
6.8 |
India
3/ |
4.7 |
5.0 |
5.4 |
6.4 |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
6.1 |
5.6 |
6.6 |
ASEAN-5
4/ |
6.2 |
5.2 |
4.6 |
5.6 |
|
-0.4 |
0.2 |
|
... |
... |
... |
Emerging and Developing Europe |
1.4 |
2.8 |
2.8 |
2.9 |
|
0.4 |
0.0 |
|
3.4 |
3.0 |
3.5 |
Latin America and the Caribbean |
2.9 |
2.6 |
2.0 |
2.6 |
|
-0.5 |
-0.3 |
|
1.9 |
1.9 |
2.6 |
Brazil |
1.0 |
2.5 |
1.3 |
2.0 |
|
-0.6 |
-0.6 |
|
2.2 |
1.3 |
2.2 |
Mexico |
4.0 |
1.1 |
2.4 |
3.5 |
|
-0.6 |
0.0 |
|
0.6 |
3.0 |
3.4 |
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan, and
Pakistan |
4.9 |
2.5 |
3.1 |
4.8 |
|
-0.2 |
0.2 |
|
. . . |
. . . |
. . . |
Sub-Saharan Africa |
5.1 |
5.4 |
5.4 |
5.8 |
|
0.0 |
0.2 |
|
. . . |
. . . |
. . . |
South Africa |
2.5 |
1.9 |
1.7 |
2.7 |
|
-0.6 |
0.0 |
|
2.1 |
1.7 |
2.7 |
Memorandum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Low-Income Developing Countries |
5.8 |
6.3 |
6.2 |
6.5 |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
... |
... |
... |
World Growth Based on Market Exchange Rates |
2.6 |
2.4 |
2.7 |
3.3 |
|
-0.3 |
0.0 |
|
2.9 |
2.7 |
3.1 |
World Trade Volume (goods and services) |
2.8 |
3.1 |
4.0 |
5.3 |
|
-0.3 |
0.0 |
|
. . . |
. . . |
. . . |
Imports (goods and services) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advanced Economies |
1.1 |
1.4 |
3.5 |
4.6 |
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
|
. . . |
. . . |
. . . |
Emerging Market and
Developing Economies |
5.7 |
5.7 |
4.7 |
6.4 |
|
-0.3 |
0.1 |
|
. . . |
. . . |
. . . |
Commodity Prices (U.S. dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
5/ |
1.0 |
-0.9 |
0.1 |
-4.3 |
|
0.0 |
1.7 |
|
2.6 |
-0.9 |
-5.7 |
Nonfuel (average based on
world commodity export weights) |
-10.0 |
-1.2 |
-1.7 |
-3.6 |
|
1.8 |
0.4 |
|
-2.9 |
-1.4 |
-2.7 |
Consumer Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advanced Economies |
2.0 |
1.4 |
1.6 |
1.7 |
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
1.2 |
1.7 |
1.8 |
Emerging Market and Developing Economies |
6.1 |
5.9 |
5.4 |
5.3 |
|
-0.2 |
-0.1 |
|
5.5 |
5.0 |
4.8 |
London Interbank Offered Rate (percent) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On U.S. Dollar Deposits (six month) |
0.7 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.8 |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
. . . |
. . . |
. . . |
On Euro Deposits (three month) |
0.6 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
|
0.0 |
-0.1 |
|
. . . |
. . . |
. . . |
On Japanese Yen Deposits (six month) |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
. . . |
. . . |
. . . |
|
Note: Real effective exchange rates
are assumed to remain constant at the levels prevailing during May
5–June 2, 2014. Economies are listed on the basis of economic size.
1/ Global and regional growth figures are based on new purchasing
power parity (PPP) weights derived from the recently released 2011
International Comparison Program survey (see box) and are not
comparable to the figures reported in the April 2014 WEO. The
quarterly estimates and projections account for 90 percent of the
world PPP weights.
2/ The comparisons are based on April 2014 country forecasts
aggregated with the revised PPP weights. The projections for Ukraine
are included in the July 2014 WEO Update, but are excluded in the
columns comparing the current forecasts with those in the April 2014
WEO since they were excluded at the time.
3/ For India, data and forecasts are presented on a fiscal year
basis and output growth is based on GDP at market prices.
Corresponding growth rates for GDP at factor cost are 4.5, 4.7, 5.4,
and 6.4 percent for 2012/13, 2013/14, 2014/15, and 2015/16,
respectively.
4/ Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam.
5/ Simple average of prices of U.K. Brent, Dubai Fateh, and West
Texas Intermediate crude oil. The average price of oil in U.S.
dollars a barrel was $104.07 in 2013; the assumed price based on
futures markets is $104.14 in 2014 and $99.62 in 2015. |
In emerging market and developing economies, growth is now
projected to decrease to 4.6 percent in 2014 and then strengthen to 5.2
percent in 2015. In China, the authorities have resorted to limited
and targeted policy measures to support activity in the second half of the
year, including tax relief for small and medium enterprises, accelerated
fiscal and infrastructure spending, and targeted cuts in required reserve
ratios. As a result, growth in 2014 is projected to be 7.4 percent. For next
year, although the outlook remains to an important extent a function of the
government’s target, growth is projected to moderate to 7.1 percent as the
economy transitions to a more sustainable growth path. In India,
growth appears to have bottomed out, and activity is projected to pick up
gradually after the postelection recovery in business sentiment, offsetting
the effect of an unfavorable monsoon on agricultural growth. In a number of
major emerging market economies, growth projections for 2014–15 have been
marked down. In Brazil, tighter financial conditions and continued
weakness in business and consumer confidence are holding back investment and
dampening consumption growth. In Mexico, weaker construction and a
slower U.S. recovery are projected to result in slower growth in 2014
relative to the previous forecast. In Russia, investment is expected
to remain weaker for longer, given geopolitical tensions. Growth in South
Africa is expected to stay sluggish as a result of electricity
constraints and labor conflicts.
Downside risks remain a concern
The downside risks discussed in the April 2014 WEO remain relevant.
Geopolitical risks have risen relative to April: risks of an oil price
spike are higher due to recent developments in the Middle East while those
related to Ukraine are still present. In global financial markets, there is
a risk of a renewed rise in longer-term interest rates, particularly if U.S.
long-term rates increase more sharply and rapidly than expected as monetary
policy normalization proceeds, and of a reversal in risk sentiment and risk
premium compression. In major advanced economies, there is a risk of
stagnation in the medium term. In the euro area, adverse
shocks—domestic or external—could lead to persistently lower inflation or
price declines. Emerging market economies—particularly those with
domestic weaknesses and external vulnerabilities—may face a sudden worsening
of financial conditions and a reversal in capital flows in the event of a
shift in financial market sentiment. Many of these economies also face the
risk that the factors underpinning the weakening of growth will persist into
the medium term.
Raising growth
The weaker global growth expected for the first half of this year
underscores that raising actual and potential growth must remain a priority
in most economies. Although the role of temporary factors in the slowdown in
key advanced economies in the first quarter must be recognized,
robust demand momentum has not yet emerged despite continued very low
interest rates and easing of brakes to the recovery, including from fiscal
consolidation or tight financial conditions. Monetary policy should thus
remain accommodative in all major advanced economies, although prospects for
inflation and economic slack under the baseline will call for gradual
normalization at different times. The pace and composition of fiscal
adjustment should be attuned to supporting both the recovery and long-term
growth.
To limit financial stability risks related to continued low interest
rates, the reform of financial regulation should be completed, and
macroprudential tools should be developed further and deployed.
Many emerging market and developing economies are still adjusting
to tighter financial conditions and implied higher cost of capital since May
2013 and weaker medium-term growth trajectories. But with external
vulnerabilities and little macroeconomic policy space in some cases, policy
options to support growth if needed are more limited. Allowing exchange
rates to respond to changing fundamentals and addressing problems of
inflation pressure and policy credibility where relevant will generally help
build monetary policy space.
Finally, in many economies, advanced and emerging market alike, there is
an urgent need for structural reforms to strengthen growth potential or make
growth more sustainable.
Revised Purchasing Power Parity Weights
Following the recent release of the 2011 survey by the International
Comparison Program (ICP) for new purchasing power parity benchmarks, the
World Economic Outlook’s (WEO’s) estimates of purchasing power parity
weights and GDP valued at purchasing power parities have been updated. This
box documents the implications of these changes for economies’ weight in
global GDP and for global and regional GDP growth rates in the WEO.
The ICP’s purchasing power parities indicate how many units of a
country’s local currency are needed to buy a comparable basket of goods and
services valued in a common currency (taken for convenience to be the U.S.
dollar). Roughly speaking, they are equivalent to exchange rates that
indicate equal purchasing power between local currency and the U.S. dollar.
The ICP provides purchasing power parities for a benchmark year (2011 in the
most recent release). Outside the benchmark year, the IMF follows the
standard practice of extrapolating purchasing power parities using relative
inflation rates based on GDP deflators.1
These purchasing power parities are the basis for purchasing power parity
GDP and weights in the WEO. The weights are used to compute regional and
global real GDP growth as well as other real sector aggregates, including
inflation.
The 2011 ICP revisions suggest a significantly higher purchasing power
parity weight—compared with that implied by the 2005 survey—for emerging
market and developing economies as a group and individually for many
countries (Table 2). Emerging market and developing economies’ total weight
in global purchasing power parity GDP in 2013 has risen from 51 percent as
derived from the 2005 survey to 56 percent based on the 2011 survey.
Conversely, the share of advanced economies as a group has fallen.
A higher weight in global purchasing power parity GDP and stronger real
GDP growth for emerging market and developing economies (compared with that
of advanced economies) has meant that global growth is now estimated to have
been higher in recent years. Average global growth during 2011–13 was 3.6
percent, some ¼ percentage point higher than the level based on the old
weights. Similarly, over the forecast horizon, global growth in 2014–15 is
projected to average 3.7 percent, about 0.1 percentage point higher than the
level based on the old weights.2
That said, a purchasing-power-parity-based weight is only one measure of
an economy’s systemic relevance in the global economy. When weighted by GDP
at market exchange rates, emerging market and developing economies account
for less than 40 percent of global GDP, reflecting their more limited
purchasing power in international markets. For instance, China and India are
estimated to account for 16 percent and 6.7 percent of global GDP in 2013 in
purchasing power parity terms, respectively, but only 12.7 percent and 2.5
percent in current U.S. dollars (rightmost column in Table 2).
_____________________________
1 See Angus Deaton and Bettina
Aten, “Trying to Understand the PPPs in ICP2011: Why Are the Results So
Different?” NBER Working Paper No. 20244 (Cambridge, Massachusetts: National
Bureau of Economic Research, 2014), for details on the differences in the
underlying price surveys for 2005 and 2011.
2 Note that given the changes in
underlying weights, the global and regional growth projections in the July
2014 WEO Update are not comparable with those in the published version of
the April 2014 WEO.
Table 2. Classification by World Economic Outlook
Groups and Their Shares in Aggregate GDP, 2013
(Percent of total for group or world) |
|
|
|
ICP 2011 |
ICP 2005 |
Difference |
U.S. Dollars |
|
|
Advanced Economies |
World |
Advanced Economies |
World |
Advanced Economies |
World |
World |
Advanced Economies |
36 |
100.0 |
43.6 |
100.0 |
49.4 |
0.00 |
-5.82 |
60.8 |
United States |
|
37.8 |
16.5 |
38.7 |
19.1 |
-0.91 |
-2.65 |
22.5 |
Euro Area |
18 |
28.0 |
12.2 |
26.6 |
13.1 |
1.48 |
-0.90 |
17.2 |
Japan |
|
10.5 |
4.6 |
10.8 |
5.4 |
-0.33 |
-0.77 |
6.6 |
United Kingdom |
|
5.2 |
2.3 |
5.5 |
2.7 |
-0.29 |
-0.45 |
3.4 |
Canada |
|
3.4 |
1.5 |
3.5 |
1.7 |
-0.10 |
-0.25 |
2.4 |
Other Advanced Economies |
14 |
15.0 |
6.5 |
14.8 |
7.3 |
0.15 |
-0.80 |
8.8 |
Memorandum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Major Advanced Economies |
7 |
75.2 |
32.8 |
75.7 |
37.4 |
-0.53 |
-4.63 |
46.2 |
|
|
Emerging Market and Developing Economies |
World |
Emerging Market and Developing Economies |
World |
Emerging Market and Developing Economies |
World |
World |
Emerging Market and Developing Economies |
153 |
100.0 |
56.4 |
100.0 |
50.6 |
0.00 |
5.82 |
39.2 |
Commonwealth of Independent States |
12 |
8.6 |
4.9 |
8.2 |
4.2 |
0.37 |
0.69 |
3.7 |
Emerging and Developing Asia |
29 |
50.8 |
28.7 |
51.3 |
26.0 |
-0.50 |
2.70 |
18.4 |
Emerging and Developing Europe |
13 |
6.0 |
3.4 |
6.6 |
3.3 |
-0.58 |
0.06 |
2.6 |
Latin America and the Caribbean |
32 |
15.5 |
8.7 |
17.2 |
8.7 |
-1.71 |
0.03 |
7.9 |
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan, and
Pakistan |
22 |
13.8 |
7.8 |
11.2 |
5.7 |
2.59 |
2.11 |
4.5 |
Sub-Saharan Africa |
45 |
5.3 |
3.0 |
5.5 |
2.8 |
-0.17 |
0.23 |
2.1 |
Memorandum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil |
|
5.2 |
3.0 |
5.5 |
2.8 |
-0.23 |
0.19 |
3.0 |
China |
|
28.1 |
15.9 |
30.6 |
15.5 |
-2.49 |
0.38 |
12.7 |
India |
|
11.8 |
6.7 |
11.5 |
5.8 |
0.30 |
0.84 |
2.5 |
Russia |
|
6.1 |
3.4 |
5.8 |
2.9 |
0.32 |
0.51 |
2.8 |
South Africa |
|
1.2 |
0.7 |
1.3 |
0.7 |
-0.19 |
-0.03 |
0.5 |
Sources: International Comparison
Program (ICP), 2011 Summary of Results and Findings; and IMF staff
estimates.
Note: Cells are shaded blue (red) when the shares in global GDP
based on ICP 2011 are higher (lower) relative to the shares based on
ICP 2005. |
__________________________
1/ Global and regional growth figures in this WEO
Update are computed with revised purchasing power parity (PPP) weights
(see Box) and are, therefore, not comparable to the reported figures in the
April 2014 WEO. For example, the forecast for global growth for 2015 in the
April 2014 WEO would have been 4 percent if it were computed with the
revised weights.
Source |